Welcome to Digital Camera Magazine Community Sign in | Join | Help
Comments or questions about this site? Click here
 

Young photographer of the year 2008?

Last post 13-08-2008, 12:36 PM by cinnamonstix. 16 replies.
Page 2 of 2 (17 items)   < Previous 1 2
Sort Posts: Previous Next
  •  08-08-2008, 12:57 PM 853581 in reply to 821115

    Re: Young photographer of the year 2008?

    This isnt a dig, but the people saying that some images should'nt of won, over edited etc. You guys would'nt complain if it was your image eh? and in the end, everyone enters images they think are good themselves, but its not nessesarily what the judges are looking for this time.

    NOT A DIG lol just a view :)

  •  13-08-2008, 12:36 PM 856813 in reply to 853581

    Re: Young photographer of the year 2008?

    i agree with blackluckwinter. The images that won totally deserved it, i don't think its fair to say that none of them should have, even if your own image didn't win--mine didn't win either! plus, over editing means too much editing so as to take away from the image. obviously, whatever edits were made on those images made them look better, therefore being properly edited. i thought 11-14 years 1st was amazingggg.
Page 2 of 2 (17 items)   < Previous 1 2
View as RSS news feed in XML