martin_hurton:
As I said in one of my previous posts, either we were fed a load of rubbish by the magazines and 6MP cameras were not up to the job (but then where did the double page images come from?) or there is a snobbery designed to keep us having to buy the latest kit. I think it's teh latter myself, but that leaves us with the sad fact that the reviewers are liars (or have even shorter memories than us).
Call me a cynic but I remember pre digital when manufactures released a new model every 3 to 5 years and the photographic magazine publishing business shrunk from about a dozen to about three magazines.
Now look how many mags there are now, more cameras every 12 months means more to fill the pages with, more advertising revenue, more magazine sales more jobs more profit.
Off course its a self perpetuating myth that equipment is everything, theres far to much at stake to say anything else, especially for some of the "expert" photographic journalists that were shooting the occasional pic and article of cows and sheep for the local country mag as journo hacks before the golden goose of digital..told you I was a cynic.![Wink [;)]](/emoticons/emotion-5.gif)
Paul
My glass is 4/3rds full :)
MY GALLERY