Welcome to Digital Camera Magazine Community Sign in | Join | Help
Comments or questions about this site? Click here
 

Photography and the law

Last post 17-06-2008, 4:49 PM by admin. 79 replies.
Page 6 of 6 (80 items)   « First ... < Previous 2 3 4 5 6
Sort Posts: Previous Next
  •  04-06-2008, 2:13 PM 813750 in reply to 813746

    Re: Photography and the law

    How bizarre, photojournalists complaining about having their photo taken in a public place Huh? [:^)]
    Oh Lord, please help me to be the person that my dog thinks I am.
  •  04-06-2008, 2:19 PM 813757 in reply to 813750

    Re: Photography and the law

    My take on the issue is that the journalists have been registered into the system, hence they will likely pop up in searches for extremists/activist, when in fact they're not.

    I can understand their concern, as a photojournalist is likely to attend numerous rallies for his work, then because he's a frequent attender is likely to be labelled as a trouble maker. When his reasons for attending were not in support/against the rally, but more just to report on it.

    H.

    My Gallery.

    flickr gallery
  •  04-06-2008, 2:30 PM 813760 in reply to 813757

    Re: Photography and the law

    At the Olympic Torch Relay in London I saw quite a few antagonistic photographers (not sure if they were pro or not, as they didn't seem to be wearing accreditation), but these gits give all us of a bad name. Hence why the mounted Police were taking their pictures.

    ID'ing an accredited journo is very simple these days.. they flash their Press Pass and the Police can then phone through to a central number where the journo has to confirm their personal password.

    It does seem like mass paranoia on behalf of the Police tho, and that's why I'm taking some fun in challenging them, when they challenge me. Oh yes, and I'm carrying Garry's letter from the Home Office.. http://blog.glnphotography.com/


    EyeWest Photography
  •  04-06-2008, 3:40 PM 813810 in reply to 813757

    Re: Photography and the law

    hevans:
    My take on the issue is that the journalists have been registered into the system, hence they will likely pop up in searches for extremists/activist, when in fact they're not.

    I can understand their concern, as a photojournalist is likely to attend numerous rallies for his work, then because he's a frequent attender is likely to be labelled as a trouble maker. When his reasons for attending were not in support/against the rally, but more just to report on it.

    H.

    To be fair Hugh, registering the Journo's could also be a good way of excluding them from any such searches as a known Journalist. From what I understand it is no more than taking a picture and giving it a reference number. I think calling it harassment is a bit rich when the NUJ don't really know what is going on.

    With the number of times anyone in town appears on CCTV footage, and the current craze for numberplate recognition camera's to track peoples movements, record gathering, phone call recording - especially mobiles, I would have thought that being catalogued on the street would be well down their list of concerns, perhaps it might make them think a little more about the harassment the Journo's normally dish out to others when they are not photographing protests, but I doubt it.

    Cheers, Peter.


    Oh Lord, please help me to be the person that my dog thinks I am.
  •  17-06-2008, 4:49 PM 821717 in reply to 813810

    Re: Photography and the law

    Thanks to everyone for their views and questions - all will become clear in Issue 75.

    Does anyone have any more specific quetions they'd like answered?

    Rach @ DCM
Page 6 of 6 (80 items)   « First ... < Previous 2 3 4 5 6
View as RSS news feed in XML