Welcome to Digital Camera Magazine Community Sign in | Join | Help
Comments or questions about this site? Click here
 

POTD etc

Last post 24-09-2008, 2:32 PM by Simmotino. 342 replies.
Page 5 of 23 (343 items)   « First ... < Previous 3 4 5 6 7 Next > ... Last »
Sort Posts: Previous Next
  •  22-01-2008, 8:34 PM 706581 in reply to 706563

    Re: POTD etc

    Spiritflier:

    I was beginning to sense some good intentions on the part of the magazine... First with JD's 'promotion' and potential input to the site and also for actually managing to have two decent POTD's from ABERS and from Zuzana D. Both of whom are regulars on this forum and whose inclusion into the POTD 'hall of fame' is warranted.

    However, things do not really appear to have improved. I used to look (wishfully) at the homepage in the hope that maybe one of mine had been good enough to be selected or at the very least, that the shot was from someone I've come to know on here although that happens so infrequently as to essentially stick two fingers up to those of us who do make the effort to keep this place alive. Shoving pictures up from people who might have one shot in their gallery posted when God was a child really doesn't do much to enamour the 'powers-that-be' to the rest of us!

    So come on... Learn how to use the 'RECENTLY CHANGED' button on the gallery homepage and pick images from those who CONTRIBUTE to this place... In other words; we'll help to keep this place vibrant and useful and you'll recognise this by rewarding those who have made the effort.

    here here.

    or is it hear hear?


    IMG_7252 Banner
  •  22-01-2008, 10:21 PM 706743 in reply to 706581

    Re: POTD etc

    Clown. Think you are the first.

    Arrogant prat.


    Kevin Ross
  •  22-01-2008, 10:22 PM 706746 in reply to 706743

    Re: POTD etc

    who you on about?


    IMG_7252 Banner
  •  22-01-2008, 10:29 PM 706757 in reply to 706746

    Re: POTD etc

    Nothing like a random outburst of cyber hatred to brighten a thread.



    The all new Matt Harris Photography
    DCM Gallery
  •  22-01-2008, 10:32 PM 706762 in reply to 706757

    Re: POTD etc

    yeah what the hell was the about????

    very random Confused [8-)]


    TBPITW 7 times
    miniheader
  •  22-01-2008, 10:34 PM 706766 in reply to 706578

    Re: POTD etc

    mattharrisuk:
    I think it should just go back to us voting for it, but with careful moderation, from the nonexistant mods.


    erm,  thanks Matt. Big Smile [:D]




    My website Camera Craniums







  •  22-01-2008, 10:37 PM 706768 in reply to 706766

    Re: POTD etc

    Oh look hes gone...

    ...all for the greater good i guess...?


    IMG_7252 Banner
  •  22-01-2008, 10:38 PM 706772 in reply to 706766

    Re: POTD etc

    Lurkalot:

    mattharrisuk:
    I think it should just go back to us voting for it, but with careful moderation, from the nonexistant mods.


    erm,  thanks Matt. Big Smile [:D]



    I've already mentioned you and JD as being the only mods that actually pay attention to the site.
    So dont get tetchy with me! Wink [;)]

    The all new Matt Harris Photography
    DCM Gallery
  •  22-01-2008, 10:41 PM 706773 in reply to 706772

    Re: POTD etc

    mattharrisuk:
    Lurkalot:

    mattharrisuk:
    I think it should just go back to us voting for it, but with careful moderation, from the nonexistant mods.


    erm,  thanks Matt. Big Smile [:D]



    I've already mentioned you and JD as being the only mods that actually pay attention to the site.
    So dont get tetchy with me! Wink [;)]

    lol...  Stick out tongue [:P]




    My website Camera Craniums







  •  22-01-2008, 10:47 PM 706781 in reply to 706773

    Re: POTD etc

    I just think if we all voted on what we think should be POTD, it'd give us all something to properly discus and critique together, and come to a reason which submission should be POTD, and why.


    The all new Matt Harris Photography
    DCM Gallery
  •  22-01-2008, 11:05 PM 706803 in reply to 706781

    Re: POTD etc

    mattharrisuk:
    I just think if we all voted on what we think should be POTD, it'd give us all something to properly discus and critique together, and come to a reason which submission should be POTD, and why.

    Sounds good to me.   Not sure what plans JD has for the future, but I'm sure he has some up his sleeve. Wink [;)]

    Going back to picking the POTD.   You know it's a hell of a job when you have 32,439 galleries to trawl though, and in those galleries there's 184,561 photos, and 168,815 comments.  And with the site as slow as it is, try browsing through that lot. lol..

    Glad I don't have to do it.  Wink [;)]

     




    My website Camera Craniums







  •  22-01-2008, 11:15 PM 706808 in reply to 706803

    Re: POTD etc

    Somebody [not me] needs to write a preloader for the site.
    It'll run so much better.

    The site isnt THAT complex. The only difficulty is all the galleries, which have seperate folders and such.
    A preloader would sort it all out.


    The all new Matt Harris Photography
    DCM Gallery
  •  22-01-2008, 11:45 PM 706830 in reply to 706563

    Re: POTD etc

    Spiritflier:
    *rant truncated*


    I didn't choose Zuzana, ABERS or anyone else because they are regulars who keep this place alive or because their fame was 'warranted', I chose them because the single particular photo they had recently uploaded was a great image. And I'm just as likely to pick a photo by someone with one shot in his or her gallery than I am a photo by someone who's uploaded 10,000 photos over the last 3 years. For your "inclusion in the hall of fame to be warranted", take a good photograph.

    It's a level playing field. And contrary to what you might think, this makes it entirely fair.

    Despite what's happened previously, only images less than two weeks old will be chosen - I start from page one of Recently Changed and move backwards, looking for shots that blow me away.

    My sincere apologies for today's non-update; I am trying my best to keep things daily but was in London all day today. Please don't worry that you might have 'missed out' if you upload on a day I don't get the time to update - as I said, I look over all shots from the last two weeks before I make a decision.


    James De Vile
    digitalcameramagazine.co.uk
    Future Publishing
  •  22-01-2008, 11:46 PM 706831 in reply to 706808

    Re: POTD etc

    mattharrisuk:
    Somebody [not me] needs to write a preloader for the site.
    It'll run so much better.

    The site isnt THAT complex. The only difficulty is all the galleries, which have seperate folders and such.
    A preloader would sort it all out.

    Matt, I Know nothing about websites, as you've probably guessed.  Wink [;)]  But doesn't a preloader hold back the page until everything has loaded, then display the page?  Wouldn't this make matters worse?




    My website Camera Craniums







  •  22-01-2008, 11:47 PM 706833 in reply to 706831

    Re: POTD etc

    Lurkalot:

    mattharrisuk:
    Somebody [not me] needs to write a preloader for the site.
    It'll run so much better.

    The site isnt THAT complex. The only difficulty is all the galleries, which have seperate folders and such.
    A preloader would sort it all out.

    Matt, I Know nothing about websites, as you've probably guessed.  Wink [;)]  But doesn't a preloader hold back the page until everything has loaded, then display the page?  Wouldn't this make matters worse?



    thats pretty much the gist of it.
    But you can set them for each page. So it wont fire up until its all loaded.
    It loads quicker that way, instead of loading random pieces and trying to fit them into the scheme of things.



    The all new Matt Harris Photography
    DCM Gallery
Page 5 of 23 (343 items)   « First ... < Previous 3 4 5 6 7 Next > ... Last »
View as RSS news feed in XML