Welcome to Digital Camera Magazine Community Sign in | Join | Help
Comments or questions about this site? Click here
 

POTD etc

Last post 24-09-2008, 2:32 PM by Simmotino. 342 replies.
Page 1 of 23 (343 items)   1 2 3 4 5 Next > ... Last »
Sort Posts: Previous Next
  •  22-11-2007, 3:47 PM 657379

    POTD etc

    I don't know about you lot, but I think the way the POTD and MPOTD is chosen is a bit of a fix.  Either that, or the way images are chosen is out of sheer laziness on behalf of the 'can't really be bothered' attitude form the magazine editors.  I'm not saying that the images aren't worthy contenders, I have respect for all those members who get work up there.  But surely there are more than five or six galleries to choose great images from.  It seems to me the same 5 or six people are getting their work exposed and are moving round in turn so no one else seems to get a look in.  I'm not known as the envious type, but I am angry and do believe the management use these selected galleries because they can't be bothered to look any further.  I for one will immediately cancel the magazine at my news agent and go back to reading the good old Amateur Photographer.



  •  22-11-2007, 7:11 PM 657517 in reply to 657379

    Re: POTD etc

    Well you can't be talking about me Keith, i have only had 2 images in the last 3 months. However i can understand what you are saying. There is no doubt in my mind that David's work is outstanding and many of this images are easily front page material, that said i do remember when Tim's work was being selected regularly how people got hacked off with that.

    The system currently in use is an improvement but as you say there are many galleries with worthy images out there.

    Regards

    Dave

  •  23-11-2007, 8:10 AM 657912 in reply to 657379

    Re: POTD etc

    OK there seems to be currently a round robin of contributors to the PTOD and the smaller pictures, and I have no idea who selects them, but you have to concede that the pictures selected are amongst the better ones that are posted on this site.

    What I find interesting and enjoy is the fact that I am lead to galleries I haven't visited before and can see a greater breadth of work that does exist on the site. I suppose that this is mainly from the smaller images and from contributors that only post their work in their gallery rather that the other threads that exist.

    I don't quite see how a boycott of DCM will change the web site set up.


    FACES,STREET,PROTEST & CANDID
    A BLOG
    My Flickr
  •  23-11-2007, 11:24 AM 657999 in reply to 657912

    Re: POTD etc

    Quote."I don't quite see how a boycott of DCM will change the web site set up"

    It won't, Abbers.  My argument isn't with the photographer - the images that get up there are very good and worthy.  My gripe is that there does seem to be a bias in the way they are selected.  I have trawled through quite a few of the galleries in this past week or two and on the whole there is an awful lot of garbage - only to be expected I suppose.  However, I have also come across some really good work from photographers who have never ever had their work published, and it should be encouraged via the front page, for the richness of work on this site should be open to all that way.  Now, DCM ensure me that the search through hundreds of galleries every day to sellect the POTD and MPOTD images.  I find that very hard to believe under the circumstances, but they insist that they do. 

    My view is that the team at DCM need to put together these images very quickly and have a small number of peoples galleries where they know they can find work of reasonably high enough standard.  That's OK, but if that is the case, then at least have the decency to be honest enough and say so.  Am I envious?  - NO, that's not me at all.  Am I angry about it? - YES, but only because I would like to see a wider choice of images that truly reflect those photographers that are on the site.





  •  23-11-2007, 11:38 AM 658016 in reply to 657379

    Re: POTD etc

    KeithT:
    I for one will immediately cancel the magazine at my news agent and go back to reading the good old Amateur Photographer.

    What's AP like Keith? I for one have been getting a bit bored with DCM of late and have been considering a change for a while now especially as my subs are due for renewal after the January issue.

  •  23-11-2007, 12:07 PM 658039 in reply to 658016

    Re: POTD etc

    Alan, I have been reading the magazine for many years and still have copies dating back to the 90's.  It is a weekly mag which has a 50/50 split between content and advertising.  Even so it is the most popular photo mag in the UK and I always find the advertising section very useful.  Here's their website.  http://www.amateurphotographer.co.uk/



  •  23-11-2007, 12:39 PM 658064 in reply to 658039

    Re: POTD etc

    Cheers Keith.
  •  23-11-2007, 1:15 PM 658098 in reply to 657999

    Re: POTD etc

    Keith:-YES, but only because I would like to see a wider choice of images that truly reflect those photographers that are on the site.

    Today could be the day!


    FACES,STREET,PROTEST & CANDID
    A BLOG
    My Flickr
  •  23-11-2007, 5:35 PM 658325 in reply to 658098

    Re: POTD etc

    Absolutely, Abbers.  That's why I had a gripe in the first place.



  •  23-11-2007, 5:47 PM 658342 in reply to 658098

    Re: POTD etc

    When I saw todays POTD I was shocked!......it wasn't me!! I'll give DCM a few days to put things right and if I'm not up there again soon I'll be cancelling my subscription to DCM for Viz. Big Smile [:D]

    Keith I agree there's a lot of good photographers amoungst the dross that don't get seen but when were they last on the site and would they even see their shot up there...I realise it's not for their benefit really but a good reason to see good examples for the rest of us...but DCM did do as you said for a while and all they got were complaints that they were shots that were years old from members that never showed up or updated their gallerys. There were also complaints of too many one or two shot gallerys being picked. So I'm guessing they're now leaning more towards the recently updated list which would reduce the amount of  different photographers but would keep the regulars happy (well some of themWink [;)] )..... Just a guess.

    Must say I've been waiting for the noose to come out. Luckily my next batch of photos are a bit dull....watch out Wayne.Big Smile [:D]

     




    BPITW won 7 times.

    My Flickr gallery
  •  23-11-2007, 7:23 PM 658481 in reply to 658342

    Re: POTD etc

    Well, David, I can only say my stuff can't be worthy of a showing then, because I've never had the privilage of being chosen.  But this wasn't about me, it was about DCM taking the easy way out and not searching the galleries for the good stuff that is definitely out there.  Having said that, they must have taken my email to them seriously, as the latest POTD contender is someone I have never heard of before.  And not before time if you ask me.



  •  24-11-2007, 9:53 AM 658996 in reply to 658481

    Re: POTD etc

    I've heard of Victoria sims and seen her photos before...I think she's also joined our DCM group at Flickr. Really good photos...and it's good to see her on the front page. But yes I agree a bit more variety would be nice.


    BPITW won 7 times.

    My Flickr gallery
  •  28-11-2007, 11:14 PM 663593 in reply to 657379

    Re: POTD etc

    KeithT:
    I don't know about you lot, but I think the way the POTD and MPOTD is chosen is a bit of a fix.  Either that, or the way images are chosen is out of sheer laziness on behalf of the 'can't really be bothered' attitude form the magazine editors.  I'm not saying that the images aren't worthy contenders, I have respect for all those members who get work up there.  But surely there are more than five or six galleries to choose great images from.  It seems to me the same 5 or six people are getting their work exposed and are moving round in turn so no one else seems to get a look in.  I'm not known as the envious type, but I am angry and do believe the management use these selected galleries because they can't be bothered to look any further.  I for one will immediately cancel the magazine at my news agent and go back to reading the good old Amateur Photographer.

     

    Hey Kieth, surely the best way forward is for contributors to this thread who are like minded is to lobby the magazine, because without readers there will be no magazine.


    Be nice to each other


    My DCM Gallery
  •  29-11-2007, 9:59 AM 663795 in reply to 663593

    Re: POTD etc

    That's true, licol.  But I've already had a conversation with them by email, and frankly they will always offer the excuses that they look through hundreds of galleries every day and fairly sellect what they consider to be the best.  Oh yeah!  If you can believe that you will believe that pigs really do flyBig Smile [:D]  Time is the problem.  They don't have any of it for searching galleries.  So the easy way out is to have a half dozen sites that turn out reasonable images and use them over and over again in turn, hoping no one will notice.  I rest my case.



  •  29-11-2007, 10:47 AM 663811 in reply to 663795

    Re: POTD etc

    Well given how slow the galleries seem to be they probably dont bother just say that they do ...lol

    when are they going to speed the site up a bit ?

    My DCM Gallery

    My Website
Page 1 of 23 (343 items)   1 2 3 4 5 Next > ... Last »
View as RSS news feed in XML