Welcome to Digital Camera Magazine Community Sign in | Join | Help
Comments or questions about this site? Click here
 

Old Manual lenses - very surprised

Last post 09-08-2008, 1:38 PM by Dave Venables. 10 replies.
Sort Posts: Previous Next
  •  23-07-2008, 12:57 PM 844745

    Old Manual lenses - very surprised

    Just managed to get a hold of a 55mm Micro-nikor f2.8 off ebay for $84.

    It's my first fully manual lens and although at the start it is a bit of a faf with the manual focusing and aperture ring I'm glad I persevered.  The crispness and colour rendition on this lens is incredible and to be honest it blew me away.

    Might go and see what other 'oldies' are kicking about to see if I can get another bargain.
    Does anyone else have any other old manual lenses that they sware by?

    Graeme

    Not a fan of seafood, but loving the fish at the moment!!!

    My Duff Photos
  •  23-07-2008, 5:30 PM 844918 in reply to 844745

    Re: Old Manual lenses - very surprised

    I had the Nikkor 55mm 3.5 Nikkor macro, which was superb.

    Nikon users are very lucky to be able to buy such cheap glass. Pentax owners will also be able to get some bargains.


    Chris Seary

    My gallery

    My Blog
  •  07-08-2008, 4:33 PM 853010 in reply to 844918

    Re: Old Manual lenses - very surprised

    it may be a bit big for what you want but i sware by my Tamron sp 60B 300mm 2.8 its brilliant and when you get used to the manual focus properly its actuly sharper than then nikon 300mm 2.8 af-s in my own opinion. and you can buy them for around 500-600 pounds so half the price of a nikon/canon auto focus lensof this type . (view my Dmc gallery of pic of the swan's head and others with this lens)

    milky


    Milky's Gallery

    Equine photographer
  •  07-08-2008, 8:22 PM 853088 in reply to 844745

    Re: Old Manual lenses - very surprised

    Graeme Mather:
    Does anyone else have any other old manual lenses that they sware by?

    I love the 1938 uncoated 3.5cm Leica Elmar in my collection, along with the 1964 Kiev mount 50mm Jupiter 8M lens. However, sadly they aren't compatible with the 350D, and I'm not just talking about lens mounts either. Sad [:(]

    Results from these lenses can be seen here (J8M) and here (Leica Elmar).

    Galleries: Monochrome : The best
  •  07-08-2008, 10:06 PM 853170 in reply to 853088

    Re: Old Manual lenses - very surprised


    There are bargains available all over the place, I purchased my pentax bodies because I had many old lenses and I recently bought a  pentax MZ-50 with 2 auto focus zoom lenses for £60 from a second hand shop.
    Favourite lens Tamron 350mm f5.6 mirror lens, very shallow depth of field produces interesting macro shots as well.
    Dave V
  •  07-08-2008, 10:17 PM 853173 in reply to 853170

    Re: Old Manual lenses - very surprised

    Dave Venables:

    There are bargains available all over the place, I purchased my pentax bodies because I had many old lenses and I recently bought a  pentax MZ-50 with 2 auto focus zoom lenses for £60 from a second hand shop.
    Favourite lens Tamron 350mm f5.6 mirror lens, very shallow depth of field produces interesting macro shots as well.
    Dave V

    Often wondered how well a mirror lens works with a digital camera, as they are not mention much in that regard. Big Smile [:D]


    SK
    The Best Photographer in the world 4th November - 5th November 2006 & 17th-18 November 2007
    Oldboy’s Gallery
  •  08-08-2008, 9:52 PM 853891 in reply to 853173

    Re: Old Manual lenses - very surprised


    Hi Oldboy,
    two example for you from my gallery
     

     

    Dave V
  •  08-08-2008, 10:32 PM 853925 in reply to 853891

    Re: Old Manual lenses - very surprised

    Thanks Dave. Love that American football action shot. Very clear, but did you have to increase the ISO to freeze the action? Big Smile [:D]
    SK
    The Best Photographer in the world 4th November - 5th November 2006 & 17th-18 November 2007
    Oldboy’s Gallery
  •  09-08-2008, 12:58 AM 853994 in reply to 844918

    Re: Old Manual lenses - very surprised

    chris@seary.com:

    I had the Nikkor 55mm 3.5 Nikkor macro, which was superb.

    Agree Chris. it's a very nice lens indeed Wink [;)]

    Back lit flower head - reposted after a tighter crop

    RR

    Alf


    Camera Craniums site



  •  09-08-2008, 3:07 AM 854014 in reply to 853994

    Re: Old Manual lenses - very surprised

    I've got Pentax M 50mm f/1.4 and 100mm f/2.8. I haven't used either much but I'm very happy with the quality of what I have done. I've also got a Sigma 600mm mirror lens which I only bought to take pics of the moon with which it does very well, will have to give it a try on some wildlife at some point. My latest buy is a Pentax A 70-210mm f/4 constant aperture. Has auto aperture but still manual focus and its lovely. Excellent wide open too (although can't say the same about that 50mm f/1.4).

    I do need to work on my manual focusing skills tho.

    BPitW 9-10 June 2007.
    My website My flickr
  •  09-08-2008, 1:38 PM 854121 in reply to 853925

    Re: Old Manual lenses - very surprised

    OldBoy:
    Thanks Dave. Love that American football action shot. Very clear, but did you have to increase the ISO to freeze the action? Big Smile [:D]


    I've got 2 bodies an ist dl and a K10D, the istdl I use the sports setting to maitain the fastest shutterspeed using the iso number to keep it fast enough to aviod camera shake. The  K10D takes care of this using the Iso priorty setting, always using a monopod.
    My latest aquisition offers me other creative opportinities especially when the action is comming at me luckily its auto focus and allows me to concentrate solely on zoom as I have to dop the long lens and pick up the shorter zoom, (Vivitar 28-210 f4 zoom).



    A bit more' motor sporty' I think, I love the motion on the block but I've never found a crop I like more than the original, yet .

    Dave Venables


View as RSS news feed in XML