BenBirchall:Quick answer... No.
Photography is limited only by lack of vision and imagination, not location. Anyone who contradicts that is making big excuses for their failings as a photographer.
Or not trying to make a silk purse out of a sow's ear...![Stick out tongue [:P]](/emoticons/emotion-4.gif)
Longer answer....possibly....but it depends on what you're asking.
The subject you are trying to capture must be in the vicinity of your camera. You can't take the breathtaking sunset shot of the wild sea and the coastal rocks in Birmingham (can you?). You are unlikely to take some interesting street photography at the top of Ben Nevis, and you certainly aren't likely to capture that elusive shot of a kingfisher in the Mohave dessert. That said, Crafty and OldBoy have taken some great shots in the nature parks in the vicinity of Brumchester, so there does seem to be some interesting landscape/nature there.
I think the underlying question that really was being asked is whether there is a preference by the general public for a particular type of photo, e.g. stunning coastal shot/rolling hills/street photography, or a type that they hold in higher regard and can relate to more easily. If this is the case, then some parts of the country would definitely have a harder time competing. Of course, this argument then can be broadened to the further question (rhetorical...it's not a troll) of what style of subject leads itself to a greater photo...landscape, fine art, etc. This is a question that is entirely subjective and impossible to definitively answer.
Another question that springs to mind is what type of subject is "easiest" to take/get a stunning photo from? IMHO the sunset would be high on that list: find a nice-ish location with some kind of foreground interest and wait for a colourful sunset; there's plenty of time to set up and take several shots and most importantly: people relate to the shot and generally go "Ahhhh, lovely..." over sunset shots. One of the hardest (IMHO): people/street photography - time is very limited, have to get set up correctly ahead of the session (focus, exposure, must be guessed to a large extent), and to some extent it's serendipity if the right subject hoves into view at the right time - it's a matter of how much control the photographer can exert over the circumstances of the shoot. Of course, this also depends on the skills and training of the photographer.
H.
PS. There are some parts of the UK where the landscape is more stunning to view
and visit than others (Lake district, Snowdon, Cornwall, Slough
![Wink [;)]](/emoticons/emotion-5.gif)
), irrespective of photographing it, and we know this because these places are usually overrun by tourists - it's what people want to see. In Holland, the equivalents would be Kinderdijk, the bulb fields, the Veluwe and the Bijlmer in Amsterdam.
My Gallery.
flickr gallery